Metadata

Dataset ID: 6
Back to List

Study Design
Study Design Background Assessment of the uptake of a novel CXCR-4 directed radiolabelled peptide in naive and tumor bearing animals.
Study Description CXCR4
Study Type preclinical
Study Subtype in vitro and in vivo
Publication
Paper Linked yes
Paper Title D-Peptide-Based Probe for CXCR4-Targeted Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Paper Authors Kaat Luyten(1), Tom Van Loy(256), Christopher Cawthorne(3), Christophe M. Deroose(3), Dominique Schols(256), Guy Bormans(1) and Frederik Cleeren(1)
Affiliation Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven; Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven;3000 Leuven, Belgium
Paper Journal Pharmaceutics
Paper Year 2022
Paper Doi https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101619
Open Access yes
Updated Year 2022
Study Component
Multi Modality Images yes
Imaging Modality PET/CT
Radiation yes
Imaging Coverage whole body
Imaging Target CXCR4
Dataset Information
Institution KU Leuven
Pi Frederik Cleeren
Country Of Institution Belgium
Imaging Facility Molecular Small Animal Imaging Centre (MoSAIC), KU Leuven
Euro Bio Imaging Node Flanders BioImaging (Candidate EuBI node)
Country Of Imaging Facility Belgium
In Vivo Experimental Parameters
Number Of Groups 2
Types Of Groups tumour bearing animals -/+ CXCR4 blocking drug
Overall Sample Size 9
Disease Model cancer
Organ Or Tissue tumour, liver
Sample Size For Each Group 4 animals for tracer uptake, 4 animals for tracer uptake + blocking compound
Power Calculation The number of animals included in the study was based on previous reports where an approximately 70% difference was seen between naïve and blocked animals in CXCR4 expressing organs [https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/61/1/123]. Detection of such difference therefore required 3 animals per group (power = 0.95 and a = 0.05) assuming a 20% standard deviation within the groups.
Inclusion Criteria none
Exclusion Criteria none
Randomization Yes. All animals included in the study were randomly selected among tumour bearing mice with tumours at size.
Blinding no
Procedures To Keep Treatments Blind n/a
Procedures To Keep Experimenter Blind n/a
Outcome Measures Time activity curves showing uptake in tumour and liver over the 1hr scan period -/+ blocking agent
Statistical Methods one tail t-test for independent groups assuming unequal variances
Species Mice
Strain SCID Bg
Immune Status immunodeficient
Sex Female
Age 6-8 weeks on arrival
Age At Start Experiment 13 weeks
Age At Scanning Experiment S 18-21 weeks
Weight At Start Experiment 22-24g
Weight At End Experiment 22-24g
Gene CB17.Cg-PrkdcscidLystbg-J/Crl
Source Of Animals Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany)
Experimental Procedures
Pharmacological Procedures Intervention And Control yes
Pharmacological Drug AMD3100
Formulation PBS
Drug Dose 5mg/kg
Site Route Of Administration iv
Frequency Of Administration once, at the start of scanning
Vehicle Or Carrier Solution Formulation PBS
Blood Sampling no
Surgical Procedures Including Sham Surgery no
Pathogen Infection Intervention And Control no pathogens used
Analgesic Plan To Relieve Pain Suffering And Distress no
Anesthesia Type gas
Duration 75-90
Anesthesia Drugs isoflurane
Anesthesia Dose 1-2%
Monitoring Regime respiratory and temperature monitoring whilst scanning, visual surveillance during preparation and recovery
Euthanasia yes
Method cervical dislocation
Histology no
Frequency Of Imaging Single scan
Timing Of Imaging Animals scanned in accordance with radiotracer production schedule
Overall Scan Length 60 minute PET + CT
Contrast Agent Or Radio Isotope Or Challenge With Gas Molecule yes
Contrast Agent Commercial Drug none, Pentixafor
Contrast Agent Chemical Drug [18F]AlF-NOTA-DV1-k-(DV3),
Contrast Agent Dose 1.5-3.0MBq
Injection Volume 0.10ml
Injection Time 8-10 seconds
Vehicle Saline
Route Of Administration intravenous
Cell Lines Yes
Cell Line U87.CXCR4
Provenance Collaborator
Cell Injection Route subcutaneous implant
Number Of Cells 1x106 in 50% Geltrex
Name Of Reagent Geltrex
Frequency Of Experimental Procedures Single implant of tumour cells at start of experiment; tumours measured via caliper every 2-3 days
Timing Of Experimental Procedures Implants occured early afternoon, tumour measures in the morning.
Frequency Of Experimental Measurements See above
Timing Of Experimental Measurements See above
Housing Room not SPF
Dietary Intervention none
Respiration Rate only during scanning
Body Tempurature Etc only during scanning
Food Intake Measured no
Image Acquisition
Instrument Vendor Molecubes
Instrument Type β-cube, X-cube
Instrument Specifics PET: Axial FOV 130 mm, Transaxial FOV 72 mm, Resolution 850 µm, Peak Sensitivity > 12 %, Energy Resolution 12,6 %, LYSO cont./SiPM CT: cone-shaped X-ray beam and detector, tungsten anode source with focal spot size of 33µm.
Image Acquisition Parameters PET: 60 minute dynamic acquisition, Energy window 434-588 KeV. CT: 50 kVp, 480 exposures, 85 ms/projection, 100 µA tube current, rotation time 60 s, 0.8mm Al beam filtration.
Correction PET: Decay, Attenuation, Scatter, Dead time, Randoms corrected. Non-uniform radial sampling corrected, sensitivity calibrated against dose calibrator, detectors normalized.
Raw Data no
Qa Qc regular QA/QC carried out on scanners, which are under service contract
Image Correlation
Image Type Processed images (reconstructed PET and CT data)
Image Scale HU for CT, SUV for PET
Format Compression DICOM
Dimensions 3D
Overall Number Of Images 6 x PET, 6 x CT for original images, 9 individual images
Field Of View 70x70x124.8 (CT); 76.8x76.8x 153.6 (PET) for multiple animal image; individual cropped images vary
Dimension Extents 350x350x624 (CT); 192x192x384 (PET) for multiple animal image; individual cropped images vary
Size Description 70x70x124.8 (CT); 76.8x76.8x 153.6 (PET) for multiple animal image; individual cropped images vary
Pixel Voxel Size Description 0.2mm (CT), 0.4mm (PET)
Image Processing Methods Images reconstructed as below.
Image Reconstruction Algorithm OSEM (PET), 30 iterations. Iterative (CT)
Quality Control n/a
Image Smoothing Or Filtering Algorithm n/a
Image Registration Algorithm n/a
Qc Info QC: high (injections all successful as evidenced by dynamic images)
Corrections Corrections listed above
Spatial And Temporal Alignment PET and CT images aligned using rigid registration in PMOD 4.0.
Fiducials Used None
Coregistered Images Dataset includes coregistered datasets for individual animals
Transformation Matrix Other Info Transformation matrix not saved, but original multiple-animal images available
Related Images And Relationship PET and CT images aligned using rigid registration in PMOD 4.0.
Analyzed Data
Analysis Result Type Numerical
Data Used For Analysis Time activity curves generated by manual delineation of tumour and a sphere centred on the liver, scaled to SUV
Analysis Method And Details Manual delineation of tumour/placement of spherical ROIs in PMOD v 4.0.
Status complete
Ontology Terms
Ncit Imaging NCIT:C103512
Doid DOID:162
Ncit Anatomy NCIT:C12392
Ncit Species NCIT:C14238
Ncit Strain NCIT:C15159
Chebi Pharmaco CHEBI:125354
Chebi Anesthesia CHEBI:6015
Clo CLO:0009464
Back to List